Best Prop Firm 2026: Top 6 Ranked
Searching for the best prop firm means weighing dozens of evaluation firms that all promise funded capital and high profit splits. This guide cuts through the marketing. We compare the leading prop trading firms on five fixed criteria (entry cost, profit split, drawdown rules, scaling, and payout reliability) and mark per-category winners across the top six for 2026, including where FundedFast wins and where a competitor is the better call.
著者： John McLaren
簡単な回答
There is no single best firm for everyone. FTMO leads on track record and public trust (operating since 2015, the highest Trustpilot rating on this list). FundingPips has the cheapest entry on this list at $29, with E8 Funding and FundedNext tied just above at $32, and FundingPips and FundedNext lead on payout speed (on-demand and 24-hour). FundedFast (our own firm, disclosed) is the pick for multi-asset breadth (six asset classes in one account, including energy and agricultural softs), a refunded $49 entry with no time limit, and a free competition route shared with FundedNext. Below we mark narrow per-category winners instead of a single overall score.
まずはFundedFastを無料で試してみませんか？
FundedFast Openは2週間ごとに開催されます。10万ドルの仮想口座、優勝賞金25ドル、参加費無料、支払い情報の登録も不要です。実際に利用を始める前に、当プラットフォームを無料で試せる唯一の機会です。
FundedFast Openをご覧くださいこれらの企業の評価方法
We assess every prop firm on five dimensions that decide real trader outcomes: entry cost (the one-time fee and whether it is refunded), profit split (the percentage of profit you keep), drawdown rules (how much room you have before the account is terminated), scaling (how far the firm lets winning traders grow their capital), and payout speed and reliability (how fast and how consistently the firm actually pays). We weight drawdown rules and payout reliability most heavily, because those two factors decide whether a funded account survives and whether you get paid, regardless of how attractive the headline split looks. Applied honestly, that weighting favours the longest documented payout history, which is FTMO's, not ours, and the per-category winners below reflect that rather than flattering us. We still exclude firms with under two years of operating history or unresolved payout complaints, which is why some heavily advertised names do not appear below.
表示価格ではなく、実質的な総コスト
FundedFast
弊社- Entry fee
- $49
- Profit split
- Up to 90%
- Time limit
- None
- Drawdown (daily / max)
- 5% / 10%
- Platforms
- MatchTrader
- Entry fee
- $29
- Profit split
- 80-100%
- Time limit
- None
- Drawdown (daily / max)
- 5% / 10%
- Platforms
- MatchTrader, cTrader
- Entry fee
- $91*
- Profit split
- 80-90%
- Time limit
- None
- Drawdown (daily / max)
- 5% / 10%
- Platforms
- MT5, MT4, cTrader
- Entry fee
- $32
- Profit split
- 80-95%
- Time limit
- Varies by program
- Drawdown (daily / max)
- 3-5% / 10%
- Platforms
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader
- Entry fee
- $38
- Profit split
- 75-100%
- Time limit
- Varies
- Drawdown (daily / max)
- 5% / 8% (trailing)
- Platforms
- MT4, MT5, MatchTrader, TradeLocker
- Entry fee
- $32
- Profit split
- 80%, 90% or 100%
- Time limit
- None
- Drawdown (daily / max)
- 2.5% / 8%
- Platforms
- TradeLocker, cTrader, Match Trade, MT5
FundingPips wins on entry fee at $29, with E8 Funding and FundedNext tied for second-cheapest at $32. E8 Funding offers the highest purchasable day-one split (100% picked at checkout); FundedFast's 90% is the highest split, available as a paid checkout upgrade on accounts from $50K (One-Phase) or $100K (Two-Phase). FundedFast, FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding win on time limit. Drawdown and platform range vary by firm rather than having a single best answer. Outside this table, payout speed goes to FundingPips (on demand) and FundedNext (24-hour guarantee), scaling ceiling to FundedNext, and operating history to FTMO. No firm on this list wins every column.
Entry fee is the lowest advertised price for each firm's smallest account. Figures come from each firm's published terms as recorded in our competitor data, last verified between April and August 2026. Terms change often, so check the firm's current page before paying. * FTMO prices in euro, not dollars. We show the US-dollar equivalent so every firm in this table can be compared in one currency: EUR 79 converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 EUR = 1.154 USD on 11 August 2026. The amount FTMO actually charges is EUR 79, and the rate your bank applies on the day will differ.
所有権の開示: FundedFastは本ウェブサイトを運営しており、以下の比較表にはFundedFastの案件が掲載されています。当社を含むすべての企業は、同一の公開された基準に基づいて評価されており、各競合他社のサイトへのリンクも掲載していますので、皆様ご自身で数値をご確認いただけます。当社のランキング作成方法および収益モデルについては、編集方針に記載されています。 このページでは、当社を含むいかなる企業にも単一の総合スコアを付けていません。各社にはその代わりに、範囲を限定した検証可能なカテゴリー別の評価を示しており、その多くは競合他社に与えられています。あわせて、正直な長所と短所も記載しています。 編集方針をご覧ください
トップ6社を比較：カテゴリー別の勝者
FundedFast
弊社Multi-asset breadthに最適One of the lowest entries among major firms at $49, an 80% split with a 90% add-on on larger accounts, no time limit on either phase, and one account spanning forex, indices, crypto, metals, energy and agricultural softs.
メリット- Six asset classes in one account: forex (42 pairs), indices, crypto, metals including base metals, energy (Brent, WTI, natural gas) and agricultural softs
- $49 entry with the fee refunded on first payout, and no time limit on either evaluation phase
- Free route in: the bi-weekly FundedFast Open costs nothing to enter (FundedNext runs a free monthly competition too)
デメリット- Youngest firm on this list, with the smallest public review base of the firms compared here
- Weekly payout cadence is slower than FundedNext's 24-hour guarantee and FundingPips' on-demand requests
- $400K funding cap sits below FundingPips' and FundedNext's ceilings, and there are no CME futures
最低 $49利益配分 Up to 90%制限時間 なしFundingPips
On-demand payoutsに最適Cheapest evaluation on this list at $29 with profit splits up to 100% on select programs, no fixed time limit, on-demand payouts, and scaling toward $2M, though base allocations cap at $400K and the firm is younger than FTMO.
メリット- Payouts on demand: daily to monthly on your own schedule, rather than a fixed cycle
- $29 entry, the cheapest on this list (E8 Funding and FundedNext tie just above at $32)
- Scaling toward $2M through its PRIME track
デメリット- Base allocation caps at $400K; the $2M ceiling requires progressing through PRIME
- Founded in 2022, so its payout record is shorter than FTMO's
最低 $29利益配分 80-100%制限時間 なしFTMO
Track record & public trustに最適The industry veteran with the longest track record and the highest Trustpilot rating among major firms, but entry from EUR 79 (about $91) and an 80% default profit split that cost-conscious traders can beat elsewhere.
メリット- Longest documented operating history of any firm here (since 2015)
- The highest Trustpilot rating among the firms compared here
- EU-based (Czech Republic) with an established, well-documented payout record
デメリット- Most expensive entry on this list: from EUR 79 (about $91), versus $29-$49 elsewhere
- Default profit split starts at 80%; 90% requires its scaling or premium tiers
- Bi-weekly payout cycle, and no free cash-prize competition route (free trials only)
最低 $91 (EUR 79)利益配分 80-90%制限時間 なしFundedNext
Scaling & payout speedに最適Aggressive scaling to $4M, splits up to 95%, a 24-hour payout guarantee, and a genuine free monthly competition, offset by Comoros incorporation that sits outside any regulatory framework.
メリット- Highest scaling ceiling on this list at $4M
- 24-hour guaranteed payouts, the fastest fixed promise of any firm here
- Free monthly competition with real prizes, the only rival here matching FundedFast's free entry route
デメリット- Incorporated in Comoros, outside any established regulatory framework
- Time limits vary by program, so some tracks reintroduce a deadline
- 95% split is a scaled tier, not day one; the base is 80%
最低 $32利益配分 80-95%制限時間 プログラムにより異なるGoat Funded Trader
Low $38 entry and flexible splits up to 100%, but a lower $800K funding cap, a shorter operating history than the firms above it, and the oldest verification date in our data set.
メリット- Low $38 minimum entry across multiple program types
- Advertises profit splits up to 100% on specific programs
デメリット- Our Goat Funded data was last verified in April 2026 (the stalest on this page), so re-check its live terms before paying
- 8% trailing maximum drawdown is harsher than the static 10% most rivals use
- Does not publish a clear headquarters location
最低 $38利益配分 75-100%制限時間 異なるE8 Funding
Split flexibilityに最適Multiple program types, a $32 entry that ties FundedNext for second-cheapest here behind FundingPips' $29, and a profit split you pick at checkout, but a $500K funding ceiling, tight drawdown, and evaluation fees that are never refunded.
メリット- Choose your profit split (80%, 90% or 100%) at purchase, fixed for the life of the account
- Daily payout requests on E8 Pro, on-demand from day 3 on E8 One
- $32 entry with no time limit, second-cheapest here alongside FundedNext
デメリット- Evaluation fees are non-refundable under any circumstances, per its own terms
- $500K ceiling and tighter drawdown (2.5% daily on Pro, 8% max)
最低 $32利益配分 80%, 90% or 100%制限時間 なし
FundedFastの対応方法
FundedFast funds traders up to $400K in simulated capital after a one or two phase evaluation that starts at $49, one of the lowest entries among major multi-asset firms (FundingPips starts at $29, and E8 Funding and FundedNext at $32). The catalog spans seven account sizes from $5K to $400K, with an 80% profit split by default and a 90% upgrade sold at checkout on $50K+ One-Phase or $100K+ Two-Phase accounts, plus the industry-standard 5% daily and 10% maximum drawdown. The single biggest differentiator is that neither evaluation phase has a time limit, which removes the most common reason traders fail at firms like FTMO and FundedNext. Funded traders request weekly payouts through PayPal, bank transfer, or crypto with a $50 minimum, typically processed within 24-48 hours, and every challenge covers forex, indices, crypto, metals, energy and agricultural softs in one account. The free FundedFast Open competition runs every two weeks and lets prospective traders test the platform and win cash prizes without paying for an evaluation. Where FundedFast falls short: it is younger than FTMO and has a shorter public review history, its $400K cap is below the $2M-$4M that FundingPips and FundedNext offer traders chasing institutional-size accounts, its weekly payout cadence trails FundedNext's 24-hour guarantee and FundingPips' on-demand requests, and it does not offer CME futures, so dedicated futures day traders are better served elsewhere. The honest fit: FundedFast genuinely suits traders who want a wide multi-asset range in a single account, a low refunded entry with no deadline, or a free way to trial the platform before paying. It is not the right pick if you prioritise a long public payout record (FTMO), institutional-size scaling or the fastest payouts (FundingPips, FundedNext), or CME futures (a futures specialist).
これが適していない場合
This ranking is built for retail traders choosing a multi-asset or forex prop firm. It is not the right list if you trade CME futures exclusively (ES, NQ, CL), in which case a futures-specialist firm like Topstep or Apex is the better starting point. It is also not useful if you have not yet developed a tested, repeatable edge, because every firm here uses evaluation rules specifically designed to surface inconsistent traders, and no ranking can change that. Finally, traders in the 40 restricted jurisdictions listed in each firm's terms cannot participate, so confirm your country is eligible before paying for any challenge.
続けて読む
よくある質問
Which prop firm is the most trusted?
Trust comes down to operating history, payout proof, and public reviews. FTMO has the longest track record (operating since 2015) and the highest Trustpilot rating among major firms. FundingPips and FundedNext both hold public ratings above 4.4 out of 5; FundedFast's public rating currently sits at 4.3 with a smaller, growing review base. The most reliable signal is a firm's public payout history on Trustpilot and trader forums, not its marketing. Favour firms with at least two years of operating history.
Which prop firm has the highest payout?
Profit split and payout speed are two different things. On split, FundingPips and Goat Funded advertise up to 100% on specific programs, FundedNext up to 95%, and FundedFast up to 90%. On speed, FundedFast processes weekly payout requests within 24-48 hours (with a $50 minimum), competitive with FundedNext's advertised 24-hour payouts. The highest headline split is not always the best deal once you factor in entry cost, drawdown rules, and how reliably the firm actually approves withdrawals.
How much does a $100,000 funded account cost?
A $100K evaluation typically costs $300 to $600 in one-time fees, refunded on your first payout at most firms. FTMO charges EUR 439 (about $507) for its $100K two-phase challenge; FundingPips, FundedNext, and FundedFast price the same size below that. The fee is the only money you risk, since the funded capital itself is provided by the firm. Check whether the fee is refunded and whether a time limit applies before you pay.
How much does a $50,000 funded account cost?
A $50K evaluation runs roughly $150 to $350 one-time, refunded on first payout. FTMO charges EUR 345 (about $398) for its $50K two-phase challenge; lower-cost firms like FundingPips, FundedNext, and FundedFast price the same size well under that. A cheap fee with a 30-day clock can cost more in failed attempts than a slightly higher fee with no deadline, so weigh the time limit alongside the price.
Are prop firms worth it?
For a trader with a tested, repeatable edge, yes: a prop firm lets you trade larger capital than you could self-fund, and you only risk a one-time evaluation fee instead of your own savings. They are not worth it if you do not yet trade profitably in your own demo account, because evaluation rules are designed to filter out inconsistent traders quickly. Treat the fee as a one-time test of your edge, not a way to learn to trade.
How do I choose the right prop firm?
Match the firm to your strategy first. Day traders who trade CME futures should look at futures specialists; forex, crypto, and multi-asset traders are better served by firms like FundedFast, FTMO, or FundingPips. Then compare entry cost, profit split, drawdown rules, time limits, and payout reliability. Prioritise drawdown rules and payout history over headline profit splits, because those two factors decide whether you keep a funded account and actually get paid.
Which prop firms actually pay out?
Every established firm in this ranking has a documented payout history visible on Trustpilot and trader forums. The risk is concentrated in newer, unproven firms: MyFundedFX shut down in February 2026 with trader funds and pending payouts trapped. Verify payout proof before paying for any challenge, and favour firms with at least two years of operating history and a public withdrawal record.
What are the top 5 prop firms?
That depends on what you weight, which is why we assign per-category winners rather than one ordered list. For track record and public trust: FTMO, operating since 2015 with the highest Trustpilot rating among the six firms we compare. For entry cost: FundingPips, the cheapest on this list at $29, with E8 Funding and FundedNext tied just above at $32. For payout speed: FundingPips (payouts on demand) and FundedNext (24-hour guaranteed payouts, plus scaling to $4M). For asset breadth and a free entry route: FundedFast, our own firm, with forex, indices, crypto, metals, energy and agricultural softs in one account. Goat Funded Trader and E8 Funding complete the six; see the full category breakdown above.
Which is the best prop firm for beginners?
Beginners are best served by a firm with low entry cost, no time pressure, and clear rules. FundedFast fits that profile with a $49 starting fee, no evaluation deadline, and a free FundedFast Open competition to practise the platform at zero cost before paying. Whichever firm you choose, start at the smallest account size and read the rule set in full before your first trade.