September-Reset: 20% Rabatt auf alle Challenges mit dem CodeChallenge starten

Best Prop Firm With No Time Limit

One of the most common causes of evaluation failure is the time limit, not the rules. A 30-day clock pressures traders into low-conviction setups, oversized positions, and revenge trading. Removing the clock changes the game, and most major firms have done it since 2023. Here is who genuinely qualifies on every program, and where a deadline still applies.

Von John McLaren

Faktengeprüft von Gabriele Nigro · 18. August 2026

Schnelle Antwort

FundedFast, FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding all now run their evaluations with genuinely no time limit in 2026. FundedNext is the exception: its time limit varies by program, so check your specific track before paying. FundingPips has the cheapest entry at $29 ahead of E8 Funding's $32, FundedFast ships an 80% standard split with a 90% add-on on larger accounts, and FTMO leads on track record but is the most expensive entry on this list, from EUR 79 (about $91).

Tipp · Kostenlos testen

Möchten Sie FundedFast zuerst kostenlos testen?

Die FundedFast Open läuft alle zwei Wochen: 100.000 US-Dollar virtuelles Konto, 25 US-Dollar Geldpreis für den ersten Platz, keine Teilnahmegebühr, keine Zahlungsdaten erforderlich. Die einzige wirklich kostenlose Möglichkeit, unsere Plattform zu testen, bevor Sie sich festlegen.

Zur FundedFast Open

Was für diesen Anwendungsfall zählt

We consider a prop firm 'genuinely no time limit' only if all three are true: no maximum days on either evaluation phase, no minimum trading day requirement that effectively forces activity within a window, and no inactivity-based account closure within the evaluation period. Firms that advertise 'no time limit' but enforce a 30-day inactivity rule are excluded. That is a time limit by another name. Applied against our own corrected data, four of the five firms below pass: FundedFast, FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding. Only FundedNext does not, since its time limit varies by program.

Echte Gesamtkosten, nicht nur der Einstiegspreis

FundedFast

Unsere Firma
Entry fee
$49
Profit split
Up to 90%
90% is a paid checkout add-on; 80% is included by default
Time limit
None
Drawdown (daily / max)
5% / 10%
Fee refunded
Yes, on 1st payout
Entry fee
$29
Lowest entry fee on this list
Profit split
80-100%
100% is a scaled tier, not day one
Time limit
None
Drawdown (daily / max)
5% / 10%
Fee refunded
Yes, on 1st payout
Entry fee
$91**
FTMO's 1-Step tier; EUR 79 at $10K min account
Profit split
80-90%
Time limit
None
Drawdown (daily / max)
3% / 10%
1-Step (priced above); the pricier 2-Step tier runs 5% daily
Fee refunded
No
The 1-Step priced above carries no refund; only FTMO's pricier 2-Step tier refunds on your first payout
Entry fee
$32
Second-lowest entry fee, tied with FundedNext
Profit split
80%, 90% or 100%
Highest purchasable day-one split, picked at checkout
Time limit
None
Drawdown (daily / max)
2.5% / 8%
Fee refunded
No
Fees are non-refundable under any circumstance, per E8's own terms
Entry fee
$32
Second-lowest entry fee, tied with E8 Funding
Profit split
80-95%
95% is a scaled tier, not day one
Time limit
Varies by program
Drawdown (daily / max)
3-5% / 10%
Fee refunded
Yes, on 1st payout

FundedFast, FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding all now run their evaluations with genuinely no time limit; FundedNext is the one firm here where it varies by program, so check your specific track before paying. FundingPips has the lowest entry fee at $29, ahead of E8 Funding's $32. FundedFast does not win on profit split: its standard rate is 80%, with 90% available as a paid add-on on larger accounts, while E8 Funding's checkout-chosen split reaches 100% and FundingPips scales to 100%. FundedFast, FundingPips and FundedNext refund the entry fee on your first payout; FTMO's EUR 79 entry priced above carries no refund (only its pricier 2-Step tier refunds), and E8 Funding's fee is never refunded under any circumstance. Drawdown varies by firm rather than having a single best answer. No firm on this list wins every column.

Entry fee is the lowest advertised price for each firm's smallest account. Figures come from each firm's published terms as recorded in our competitor data, last verified between April and August 2026. Terms change often, so check the firm's current page before paying. **FTMO prices in euro, not dollars. We show the US-dollar equivalent so every firm in this table can be compared in one currency: EUR 79 converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 EUR = 1.154 USD on 11 August 2026. The amount FTMO actually charges is EUR 79.

Offenlegung von Beteiligungen: FundedFast betreibt diese Website, und die Challenges von FundedFast sind in den nachstehenden Vergleichen aufgeführt. Jedes Unternehmen, einschließlich unseres eigenen, wird anhand derselben veröffentlichten Kriterien beurteilt, und wir verweisen auf jeden Mitbewerber, damit Sie unsere Zahlen selbst überprüfen können. Wie wir unsere Ranglisten erstellen und unsere Einnahmen erzielen, ist in unseren redaktionellen Richtlinien dokumentiert. Auf dieser Seite vergeben wir an kein Unternehmen eine einzelne Gesamtbewertung, auch nicht an uns selbst: Jedes Unternehmen erhält stattdessen eine eng gefasste, überprüfbare Kategorie-Auszeichnung, von denen mehrere an Mitbewerber gehen, dazu ehrliche Vor- und Nachteile. Lesen Sie unsere redaktionellen Richtlinien

Die Top 5 im Vergleich: Kategorie-Sieger

  1. FundedFast

    Unsere FirmaAm besten für: No time limit with a fee refunded on first payout

    No time limit on either phase, and a $49 entry, though the split at that tier is the standard 80% and FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding now all genuinely match the no-time-limit claim too.

    Vorteile
    • No time limit on either evaluation phase
    • 80% split as standard, with a 90% add-on available on accounts from $50K (One-Phase) or $100K (Two-Phase)
    • Free recurring practice route via the FundedFast Open, itself run with no application deadline
    Nachteile
    • No longer unique on no time limit: FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding all genuinely match it now
    • Once funded, payouts require a 5-day minimum trading-day requirement within the cycle, which can frustrate traders who hold for weeks without taking new trades
    • Youngest firm on this list versus FTMO's 2015 founding, with a shorter public review history
    Ab $49Split Up to 90%Zeitlimit Keines
  2. FundingPips

    Am besten für: Cheapest entry, no time limit

    Genuinely no time limit and a $29 entry, the lowest on this list, with payouts available on demand.

    Vorteile
    • Lowest entry fee on this list at $29
    • No time limit on the evaluation
    • Payouts on demand, daily to monthly on your own schedule
    Nachteile
    • $400K base allocation before its PRIME track scales further
    • 100% profit split is a scaled-tier reward, not a day-one number; day one starts at 80%
    Ab $29Split 80-100%Zeitlimit Keines
  3. FTMO

    Am besten für: Track record and trust

    Removed its evaluation time limits in 2023, so both phases now run with no deadline, but the EUR 79 (about $91) 1-Step entry is the priciest on this list and carries no fee refund: only its pricier 2-Step tier refunds on a pass.

    Vorteile
    • No time limit on either evaluation phase since 2023
    • Longest documented operating history on this list, since 2015, and the highest Trustpilot rating
    • 80-90% profit split, matching or beating most of this list
    Nachteile
    • Most expensive entry on this list: from EUR 79 (about $91), versus $29-$49 elsewhere
    • The EUR 79 1-Step entry priced above carries no fee refund; only FTMO's pricier 2-Step tier refunds on your first payout
    Ab $91 (EUR 79)Split 80-90%Zeitlimit Keines
  4. E8 Funding

    Am besten für: Split chosen at checkout, up to 100%

    Genuinely no time limit on its evaluation, and you choose your own profit split (up to 100%) at checkout, but the entry fee is non-refundable under any circumstance, even if you pass (the only firm on this list where that is true).

    Vorteile
    • No time limit on the evaluation
    • Choose your profit split (80%, 90%, or 100%) at purchase, fixed for the life of the account
    • Second-lowest entry fee on this list at $32, tied with FundedNext
    Nachteile
    • Evaluation fee is non-refundable under any circumstance, per E8's own terms (the only firm on this list where that is true)
    • Tighter daily drawdown (2.5%) than most peers' 5%
    Ab $32Split 80%, 90% or 100%Zeitlimit Keines
  5. FundedNext

    Am besten für: Highest funding ceiling plus fastest payouts

    Aggressive $4M funding ceiling and a 24-hour payout guarantee, but time limits vary by program, so this is the one firm on this list where you must check your specific track for a deadline.

    Vorteile
    • $4,000,000 maximum funding, the highest ceiling among the firms compared here
    • 24-hour guaranteed payout turnaround, faster than most firms here
    • Also runs a free monthly trading competition
    Nachteile
    • Time limit varies by program: the only firm on this list without a flat no-time-limit answer
    • Incorporated in Comoros, outside any established regulatory framework
    Ab $32Split 80-95%Zeitlimit Variiert je Programm

Wie FundedFast das löst

FundedFast removes the time limit on both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of its evaluation. The only timing requirement is a three-day minimum on both phases, which exists to prevent random-luck passes in a single trading session. There is no inactivity-based termination during the evaluation period. After funding, the only timing rule is a five-day minimum trading-day requirement in any payout cycle. The honest weakness: the no-time-limit policy applies to the evaluation. Once you are funded, requesting payouts requires the 5-day minimum trading days within the cycle, which can frustrate traders who hold for weeks at a time without taking new trades.

Wann das Modell nicht passt

If you trade actively every day and intend to hit profit targets quickly, the no-time-limit benefit is wasted. A deadline is irrelevant to high-frequency day traders who pass in a week regardless. The unlimited-time advantage matters most to swing traders and to anyone trading around full-time work.

Häufige Fragen

Why do prop firms impose time limits?

Time limits filter out traders who do not have a tested edge. A profitable strategy will produce results within a window. The downside is they also filter out perfectly capable traders who are forced into bad decisions under deadline pressure.

Which prop firms have no time limit?

FundedFast, FundingPips, FTMO and E8 Funding all run their evaluations with genuinely no time limit in 2026. FundingPips has the lowest entry fee at $29; E8 Funding follows at $32. FTMO qualifies too but at the highest entry price on this list, from EUR 79 (about $91). FundedNext is the exception: its time limit varies by program, so check your specific track before paying.

Does FundedFast really have no time limit?

Yes, on both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the evaluation. The only timing requirement is a three-day minimum trading days on each phase, which exists to prevent single-session lucky passes.

Is no time limit better for beginners or experienced traders?

Both, but for different reasons. Beginners benefit by being able to take their time learning the rules. Experienced traders benefit by being able to wait for high-conviction setups instead of forcing trades to hit a deadline.

Der nächste Schritt liegt bei Ihnen

Bereit für Ihre erste Challenge?

Ab 49 US-Dollar. Kein Zeitlimit. Bis zu 90 Prozent Gewinnanteil. Gebühr wird mit der ersten Auszahlung erstattet.